[address-policy-wg] 2008-01 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)

Filiz Yilmaz wrote:

> We encourage you to send your comments to address-policy-wg at ripe.net 
> before 16 April 2008.

I strongly oppose this (2008-01) proposal for the reasons James A. T. 
Rice has given. Why would we want to forward all the messy swamp space 
issues we have in IPv4 to IPv6?

I abstain from voting on 2008-02, I don't think it is necessary to push 
address space to people who don't use it. No size fits everyone, getting 
PAv6 is easy enough (especially since 2006-02) and allocations serve as 
good indicator for the growth of IPv6. Also I suspect this will create 
issues with the scoring system for people who suddenly have to pay for 
address space they didn't even want. But if the community thinks that 
this is a good move then go ahead.

Regards,
Bernhard