[address-policy-wg] 2007-08 Review Period extended until 9 July 2008 (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 Review Period extended until 9 July 2008 (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 Review Period extended until 9 July 2008 (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jay Daley
jay at nominet.org.uk
Fri Jun 13 11:39:32 CEST 2008
Randy I'd like to continue this thread because I think it goes to the heart of the issues around exhaustion, but it is not directly relevant to this policy proposal, so bearing that in mind ... > >> Rival databases, based around IPv4 trading exchanges, will spring up. > > Why do you believe this won't happen due the vacuum created by the lack > > of RIR involvement? > > and why would a little competition at serving us, the users of all this > stuff, necessarily be a bad thing? Because I believe we should continue with open, consensus-driven, policy based allocation mechanism, not a competitive market, for all the reasons previously given. > how much is an x.509/3779 cert and an in-addr.arpa entry worth, anyway? I think a price of 100m euros for a /8 is not unreasonable. If we were to charge pre-RIR /8s that in order for them to get cert to join global secure routing then the reclaim/reuse solution might start be very effective. Jay
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 Review Period extended until 9 July 2008 (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 Review Period extended until 9 July 2008 (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]