[address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mohacsi Janos
mohacsi at niif.hu
Wed Jan 16 15:24:37 CET 2008
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, michael.dillon at bt.com wrote: >> And how many get cancelled each year because they are not >> being paid for, and if they do it's much easier to remove a >> domain name from the internet. Unless there would be an >> active system with signatures it's very hard to make sure >> cancelled PI/PA blocks will disappear from the DFZ. > > First of all, if a PI block is not paid for it will disappear > from RIPE's DB. I would expect many ISPs to have an internal > process for IPv6 Peering customers to regularly check the DB. > > Also, there are a number of groups which regularly analyze BGP > announcements looking for things like bogons and ghost-routes. > I would expect one or more of those groups to include unregistered > PI blocks in their reporting. A greater number of ISPs will > probably track these reports to make sure that they are > following best practices. Alternatively, PI holders should pay few (> 5) years IPv6 PI registration fee in advance... Janos Mohacsi Network Engineer, Research Associate, Head of Network Planning and Projects NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY Key 70EF9882: DEC2 C685 1ED4 C95A 145F 4300 6F64 7B00 70EF 9882
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]