[address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)

Mikael Abrahamsson pisze:
>
>> - 100E yearly maintenance
>
> If not higher. Hidden cost to the community is much much higher as 
> each PI announcement translates (in the long run) to more expensive 
> routing platforms.
>
> We made a boo-boo with IPv4 in the PI area, let's not do it again with 
> IPv6. Assign real cost to having a slot in the global DFZ. That way 
> people that really really need PI will pay it (at 1000E a year it's 
> still a win situation at a few tens of work hours) and the ones who do 
> not, will not clutter the DFZ.
>
If the price will be higher, then everybody join to RIPE as LIR. And 
then we will have +1000% of LIRs. Do "we" need this?
Now everybody is waiting for some kind of statesment or procedure from 
RIPE side.

-- 
Marcin Gondek / Drixter
e-utp.net
NIP: PL1181589645
REGON: 140584662
Tel. +48602159929
Fax. +48222012418
office at e-utp.net
http://www.e-utp.net