[address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mikael Abrahamsson
swmike at swm.pp.se
Tue Jan 15 23:46:16 CET 2008
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Marcin Gondek wrote: > - 100E yearly maintenance If not higher. Hidden cost to the community is much much higher as each PI announcement translates (in the long run) to more expensive routing platforms. We made a boo-boo with IPv4 in the PI area, let's not do it again with IPv6. Assign real cost to having a slot in the global DFZ. That way people that really really need PI will pay it (at 1000E a year it's still a win situation at a few tens of work hours) and the ones who do not, will not clutter the DFZ. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]