[address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Elmar K. Bins
elmi at 4ever.de
Tue Jan 15 23:20:58 CET 2008
jarlah at imate.fi (Jarno Lähteenmäki) wrote: > Does this proposal really mean that every inetnum object holder will get > IPv6 PI block? Or should it mean that every PI assignment holder gets > also IPv6 PI assignment? I must admit I didn't read it yet, but the _sane_ way of going about it would be - Assign a v6 block to any current PI assignment or PA allocation (!) holder _if_ they apply for it - Assign a /48, _NO /56_ (crap idea). Assign longer if justified. Yours, Elmi. -- "Hinken ist kein Mangel eines Vergleichs, sondern sollte als wesentliche Eigenschaft von Vergleichen angesehen werden." (Marius Fränzel in desd) --------------------------------------------------------------[ ELMI-RIPE ]---
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]