[address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jeroen Massar
jeroen at unfix.org
Tue Jan 15 17:27:38 CET 2008
Filiz Yilmaz wrote: > PDP Number: 2008-01 > Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder Filiz Yilmaz wrote: > PDP Number: 2008-02 > Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR Both these proposals should directly be binned. Especially the /56 proposal is insane and will only result in those routes to also become into the BGP increasing the junk there even more. What happened to the idea of "Aggregation". Organizations who are not requesting address space with the currently available process are not going to deploy IPv6, going to force it down them is not going to help either. Please *BIN* these proposals. Both of them. Directly. Greets, Jeroen -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 187 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20080115/ccd87873/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]