[address-policy-wg] 2008-05 Revised/New Discussion Phase set (Anycasting Assignments for TLD's and Tier 0/1 ENUM)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-05 Revised/New Discussion Phase set (Anycasting Assignments for TLD's and Tier 0/1 ENUM)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-05 Revised/New Discussion Phase set (Anycasting Assignments for TLD's and Tier 0/1 ENUM)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
B C
brettlists at gmail.com
Tue Dec 16 16:20:30 CET 2008
I just realised that I responded directly to Antoin and missed cc to the group, so here was my response, apologies for the confusion. On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:25 AM, B C <brettlists at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Antoin Verschuren > <Antoin.Verschuren at sidn.nl> wrote: >> PDP Number: 2008-05 >> Anycasting Assignments for TLD's and Tier 0/1 ENUM >> >> While I strongly support the proposal for more than 1 anycast assignment >> per TLD/ENUM tier1 operator, I do have some problems with the definition >> of the ENUM tier1 operators. >> >> Where it says: >> >> "ENUM operators as defined by the ITU" >> >> I think it should say: >> >> "ENUM tier0/1 operators as defined by RIPE NCC" >> >> I wouldn't want the ITU to determine who should get address space, and >> the counterpart for IANA in the ENUM space is RIPE NCC. >> I see the ITU more in the role ICANN has with regards to TLD's, or >> perhaps even the US DOC. >> However the reason this was put there is that as I undertstand this area, it's not the RIPE NCC's responsibility who gets an ENUM Country Code, those are I believe approved by the ITU and then administred by the RIPE NCC. So I think "ENUM tier0/1 operators as defined by RIPE NCC" would be factually incorrect. Regards Brett
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-05 Revised/New Discussion Phase set (Anycasting Assignments for TLD's and Tier 0/1 ENUM)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-05 Revised/New Discussion Phase set (Anycasting Assignments for TLD's and Tier 0/1 ENUM)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]