This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at efes.iucc.ac.il
Sun Dec 7 12:05:39 CET 2008
At 02:29 PM 04-12-08 +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote: >At 12:37 PM 04-12-08 +0100, you wrote: >>Every RIPE member receives the invitations to the AGM, and the invitation >>contained the draft of the to-be-installed charging scheme. It was sent >>out well in advance, and there is an option to give proxy votes to other >>LIRs if you can't attend yourself. > >I am also a LIR contact for il.iucc and il.isoc and both did not receive >an invitation and I did not see any drafts as discussed. Can you find out >to which email address they sent those docs for il.iucc and il.isoc? Just to let everyone know that checking mail logs shows that the AGM email did indeed arrive at my mailbox for il.iucc and at the LIR rep for il.isoc. -Hank
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]