[address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meetingnetwork
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Fri Dec 5 16:31:46 CET 2008
Hello Clive, >> Note that I'm not a lawyer - but as far as I understand, this is how the >> articles of the NCC are set up. The majority of the LIRs (+proxy votes) >> that attend the AGM vote for the board members and decide on the charging >> scheme (and possible changes to the articles). > > But what is the quorum for the meeting? Is it really as small as under 1%? > If the meeting isn't quorate, its decisions are invalid. If you want to discuss RIPE NCC member related issues, I think you should start a discussion on members-discuss at ripe.net. Discussing the RIPE NCC AGM on this list is not really appropriate. We should focus on address policy development here. I understand that this touches both RIPE policy and RIPE NCC membership/fee issues. Let's discuss each issue on the appropriate list. Thanks, Sander Steffann APWG co-chair
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meetingnetwork
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]