[address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meetingnetwork
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meetingnetwork
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meetingnetwork
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Rob Blokzijl
k13 at nikhef.nl
Thu Dec 4 12:17:39 CET 2008
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008, Andy Davidson wrote: > > On 3 Dec 2008, at 10:48, Andrei Robachevsky wrote: > >> But meeting the "Contractual requirements" is more difficult, since in a >> way that will require the RIPE NCC to have a contract with ourselves and to >> evaluate our own request. Perhaps a more elegant solution here would be the >> one proposed by Remco back in November (to establish a policy that lets the >> NCC file a request in the ordinary way). > > Does "The RIPE Community" exist as a legal entity ? Can the community hold > the meeting resources and agree to hold a contract with the NCC ? No, and No. That is one of the reasons that back in 1992 the 'RIPE Community' decided to create the RIPE NCC. > > Andy Rob
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meetingnetwork
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meetingnetwork
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]