[address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meetingnetwork
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meetingnetwork
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meetingnetwork
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Tue Dec 2 23:48:15 CET 2008
Elisa Jasinska wrote: > I can only second Niels here. While organizing conferences and events > with network infrastructure myself, I can tell that it is a hassle to > re-arrange temporary PI every time... so I do see the incentive. But why > should the NCC be a special case and no one else? perhaps someone could phrase the general case? randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meetingnetwork
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meetingnetwork
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]