[address-policy-wg] new policy idea for PA allocations
matthew.ford at bt.com matthew.ford at bt.com
Thu Aug 7 12:12:44 CEST 2008
Remco, > -----Original Message----- > From: address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net > [mailto:address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Remco van Mook > Sent: 07 August 2008 10:12 > Subject: RE: [address-policy-wg] new policy idea for PA allocations > > > Could someone submit another request immediately afterwards though, > > since current policies are based on need? > > That's why I referred to the 80% rule in my mail - if you > again qualify > for another allocation you can come back for one. If that's immediate, > it's immediate. What's the point? If I qualify for a /15 and I want a /15 but all the RIR has available is a bunch of /18s, I'll take those /18s. That sucks but it doesn't suck as much as if I have to make 8 applications to get those /18s.