[address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] Joking follow-up
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [ipv6-wg] Joking follow-up
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Joking follow-up, second round
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Iljitsch van Beijnum
iljitsch at muada.com
Wed Apr 30 17:01:32 CEST 2008
On 30 apr 2008, at 16:05, <michael.dillon at bt.com> <michael.dillon at bt.com> wrote: > According to current RIPE policy, you assign each one of these DSL or > cable modem customers with a /48. Mobile phones are different and > should > probably get a /64 since their internal networks will not have > additional interfaces added. That is a misconception. If I want to go online with my laptop through my mobile phone's cellular link, I need a prefix between the laptop and the phone and then something between the phone and the ISP. So that could be two separate /64s or some other setup, but just an address for the phone doesn't cut it.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [ipv6-wg] Joking follow-up
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Joking follow-up, second round
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]