This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2008-01 Review Period extended until 16 May 2008 (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 Review Period extended until 16 May 2008 (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 Review Period extended until 16 May 2008 (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andy Davidson
andy at nosignal.org
Wed Apr 30 01:16:05 CEST 2008
On 28 Apr 2008, at 13:48, Carlos Friacas wrote: >> PDP Number: 2008-01 >> Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder > I'm against this proposal. > I'm in favour of IPv6 PI allocations which are the result of an > explict IPv6 address request (from future holders). I agree with Carlos. I find it frustrating that I can't request IPv6 PI for my customers who want it today, but here we have a proposal suggesting anyone with v4 PI can have some v6 PI automatically. I would be rolling out v6 PI services for customer networks if I could ask for some v6 PI ! Andy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 Review Period extended until 16 May 2008 (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 Review Period extended until 16 May 2008 (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]