This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2008-01 Review Period extended until 16 May 2008 (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 Review Period extended until 16 May 2008 (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 Review Period extended until 16 May 2008 (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Lutz Donnerhacke
lutz at iks-jena.de
Tue Apr 29 13:21:38 CEST 2008
In iks.lists.ripe.address-policy-wg, you wrote: > Le lundi 28 avril 2008 à 12:43 +0000, Lutz Donnerhacke a écrit : >> * Frederic wrote: >> > we suggest /48 for /22 or more Ipv4 PI Holder. >> > and /56 for less /22 (/23 /24) ipv4 pi Holder. >> >> This proposal is about IPv6 PI for every IPv4 PA holder. >> It's not for IPv4 PI. > > PROPOSAL: > Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder > > Ipv4-PI holser has inetnum. Of course. I misunderstand your intention. Sorry.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 Review Period extended until 16 May 2008 (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 Review Period extended until 16 May 2008 (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]