This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2008-01 Review Period extended until 16 May 2008 (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 Review Period extended until 16 May 2008 (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 Review Period extended until 16 May 2008 (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Lutz Donnerhacke
lutz at iks-jena.de
Mon Apr 28 14:43:46 CEST 2008
* Frederic wrote: > Le lundi 28 avril 2008 à 14:01 +0200, Filiz Yilmaz a écrit : >> PDP Number: 2008-01 >> Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder > > We support : > > we suggest /48 for /22 or more Ipv4 PI Holder. > and /56 for less /22 (/23 /24) ipv4 pi Holder. This proposal is about IPv6 PI for every IPv4 PA holder. It's not for IPv4 PI. > 1) first : use admin-c and tech-c to contact and ask if they are alive ? The role adresses have to be correct. That's part of the LIR commitment.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 Review Period extended until 16 May 2008 (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 Review Period extended until 16 May 2008 (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]