[address-policy-wg] proposal about 2007-1
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] proposal about 2007-1
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] proposal about 2007-1
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
michael.dillon at bt.com
michael.dillon at bt.com
Thu Apr 10 14:45:13 CEST 2008
> Also, the policy does not outline the form of the contract > required. As far as I understand, LIRs are pretty much free > to have the kind of a contract they choose with the end user. > With the current proposal it's even possible to have a > contract that doesn't even require any payments. I expect that most LIRs don't really know what to put in a contract for PI address applicants. Once we implement this policy proposal, the RIPE contract for PI applicants will become a model for LIRs to use for their own PI applicants. I don't expect LIRs to charge their customers anything for signing a PI contract so I agree that it is likely that existing PI users will not face any additional fees as long as they are buying some kind of network service from their LIR. --Michael Dillon
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] proposal about 2007-1
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] proposal about 2007-1
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]