[address-policy-wg] proposal about 2007-1
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] proposal about 2007-1
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] proposal about 2007-1
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Frederic
frederic at placenet.org
Wed Apr 9 12:03:20 CEST 2008
> > - changing "must" to "may" means no change from the current position > that change all, because the holder can have choice. if you don't have contract or break it for any reason : all your internet ressource are keep back. It's OK for PA : is it the main stream of the internet. but we do not want for PI. > Your argument appears to be "I just don't want to have to pay for address > space", and nothing more. This is neither a proper argument nor a > sustainable position. > No i do not say i do not want PAY : this is WRONG. i say we want to have choice for some internet ressource. > As the proposer of this policy change, I don't believe that you have > provided any substantial justification for your opinions. > > If you feel strongly about this, please feel free to either provide > credible justification or else submit an alternative policy proposal. > > we think that credible to fight for a little space of freedom and it is really a question of freedom. bst regards Frederic > Nick Hilliard
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] proposal about 2007-1
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] proposal about 2007-1
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]