This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2007-01 Last Call for Comments (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 Last Call for Comments (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 Last Call for Comments (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Frederic
frederic at placenet.org
Tue Apr 8 16:32:55 CEST 2008
> Domain names require a) a contract, and b) a yearly fee (at least for > domains under most commercially relevant top-level domains). 2007-01 is > actually modelled quite similar to the way the .DE TLD operates. > the at least is important, you have choice : contract or no contract. fees or not fees. 2007-1 limit choice : contract with LIR that has contract with RIPE or contract with Ripe is it the same. > Please re-read the discussions about 2006-01, and 2007-01, and think > about what you *really* want - good for you, and good for the Internet > as a whole. The end result will always be a compromise, because there > is no way to make everybody happy at the same time - but we need to find > a compromise that is better than what we currently have (which is *bad*). > yes. the 2007-1 concern internet ressource like AS and PI (not PA). this 2007-1 affect PI. and in a way the 2008-1 (because a lot of inetnum holder do not have contract). well for whole Internet. i do not beleive that the same rule for EVERYBODY MUST FOLLOW is the good/bad choice. what we believe is: to let a little window of freedom/choice. today ipv4-PI holder has this freedom. the compromise is: must have contract relationship become may have contract relationship. bst regards. Frederic > Gert Doering > -- APWG chair
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 Last Call for Comments (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 Last Call for Comments (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]