[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2007-01, "Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2007-01, "Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2007-01, "Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Axel Pawlik
axel.pawlik at ripe.net
Tue Apr 8 15:53:48 CEST 2008
Andy Davidson wrote: > > Hi, > > On 8 Apr 2008, at 03:18, Axel Pawlik wrote: > >> The Executive Board also understands that the proposal introduces the >> option for those End Users who cannot form a contract with a >> "Sponsoring LIR" to form a contract directly with the RIPE NCC. > > Thanks for a clear direction/opinion. Please can you identify such an > occasion when you think the above may apply ? Andy, this provision is for the case that an end user cannot find a friendly LIR / RIPE NCC member to take him under its wings. I don't think that this is a very likely case, but you mileage may vary. >> In this case the End User will be required to set up an LIR and become >> a RIPE NCC member. > > Based on Axel's comments that End Site -> LIR -> RIR will still be the > encouraged application route, and that end sites will need to join the > RIPE NCC in order to apply for resources, I support 2007-01. Misunderstanding? End users who establish a relationship with an LIR will not have to become RIPE NCC members. One contract should be enough :-) cheers, Axel
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2007-01, "Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2007-01, "Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]