[address-policy-wg] 2007-01 Last Call for Comments (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 Last Call for Comments (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 Last Call for Comments (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Tue Apr 8 14:29:25 CEST 2008
Hi Frederic, On 08/04/2008 03:58, "Frederic" <frederic at placenet.org> wrote: [...] > why is broken ? because Ripe do not implement relation between PI holder > thru Database information. > > Dead PI is like Dead Domain name. This is a fairly good analogy. My understanding of domain names is that they are normally delegated according to a contract with a registry or registrar. If the contract ends the delegation is removed. > a simple procedure thru mail communication can force to have news about > "may be Dead" block and take the good decision. > > To force "Contractual Link with Ripe" for PI bloc is not the good way. > To force Fees is not good too. I pay small fees for the domains I have registered. Is your opposition to this proposal based on the size of the fee or are you opposed to there being any fees at all? Regards, Leo Vegoda
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 Last Call for Comments (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 Last Call for Comments (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]