This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] about policy proposal : 2008-01 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: 2008-03 Discussion Period has ended (Global Policy for the Allocation of the Remaining IPv4 Address Space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Frederic
frederic at placenet.org
Tue Apr 1 16:31:09 CEST 2008
<< To qualify for a direct assignment, the organisation must become a Local Internet Registry (LIR) or have a similar contractual relation >> 2006-1 The organisation MUST be LIR. but with ipv4-PI, the organisation must not be an LIR. so for Pi-ipv6 like pi-ipv4. the organisation must request assignement thru an LIR. but not MUST be an LIR. Why PI-ipv6 is not possible today ? we beleive that is it important for organisation who use Pi-ipv4 today, to have the possiblity to request PI-ipv6. so ripe must adopt the proposal of PI-ipv6, right now. We support all of proposal that not block assignment of PI-ipv6. so we support 2006-1 the status of LIR is not required by the organisation that request but the request must be done by an LIR. and we support 2008-1 and 2005-08 End User- assignent is done by LIR or ISP. : /64 for physical/extra small organisation. /56 organisation. bst regards Frederic
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: 2008-03 Discussion Period has ended (Global Policy for the Allocation of the Remaining IPv4 Address Space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]