[address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Policy Proposal (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Policy Proposal (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Policy Proposal (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mark Pace Balzan
mpb at melitacable.com
Mon Oct 29 16:14:02 CET 2007
> > IPv6 Internet is working even now, but completely useless. Because of > there is no resources at all. > > In my opinion, the concrete goal is make 51% of _resources_ > (not users) > to be reachable through IPv6 before we run out of IPv4. If it > succeeds, > other 49% will go with "the majority", if not - IPv6 migration > completely fails and something other (NAT, secondary market of IPv4, > higher level proxies over non-IP protocols, ...) will be implemented > instead. > my 2c worth: v4 and v6 will co-exist for a while, whether we like it or not, and therefore v4 and v6 stuff will need a way to get to each other depending on the service at hand. So quite frankly, I don't see the real advantage of moving 'content' over to v6 any more than moving 'users'. I believe every operator/network/service/whatever has to make the effort to deploy and connect to the v6 world in their interest. NAT has been here for a while, and I don't view it as v6 failure. Regards Mark
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Policy Proposal (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Policy Proposal (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]