[address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Policy Proposal (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Policy Proposal (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-08 Proposal Accepted (Proposal to Amend the IPv6 Assignment and Utilisation Requirement Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Max Tulyev
president at ukraine.su
Mon Nov 12 20:59:52 CET 2007
Geoff Huston wrote: > Let me just comment on one thing here... > > Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: >> >> Saying there will be a market is harmful regardless of whether it's >> true, because that way, people will be disinclined to give back the >> address space they currently hold but don't use. So if there's going >> to be one, let it be a surprise. > > You are talking about giving an industry that is valued in the trillions > of dollars a "surprise"? Yes, it WILL be a BIG surprise for a majority of LIRs when "No more IPs left!" will be replied from RIPE NCC to their request! I think, for ~90% of them it will. So for that time we should have established rules for IP market :) -- WBR, Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253 at FIDO)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Policy Proposal (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-08 Proposal Accepted (Proposal to Amend the IPv6 Assignment and Utilisation Requirement Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]