[ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Previous message (by thread): [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Next message (by thread): [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Scott Nelson
sbn at thermeon.com
Tue May 29 19:09:29 CEST 2007
On May 29, 2007, at 11:58 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > On 29-mei-2007, at 18:40, Owen DeLong wrote: > >> Advantages of ULA-C (even to those who claim there are some): >> Virtually none. > > I'm sure you don't mind the plane renumbering in flight when it > switches from one satellite connection to the next. Myself, I'd like > to see the flight systems to have stable addressing regardless of the > orientation of the satellite antennas. I'm not seeing something here. Wouldn't the plane have an IP address given to it from the airline? If the airline needs to renumber, wouldn't they would do it in stages -- as planes land?
- Previous message (by thread): [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Next message (by thread): [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]