[ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Previous message (by thread): [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Next message (by thread): [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Iljitsch van Beijnum
iljitsch at muada.com
Tue May 29 19:32:27 CEST 2007
On 29-mei-2007, at 19:25, David Williamson wrote: >>> Disadvantages of ULA-C: >> I can't believe you keep pounding on this dead horse. These are >> PRIVATE addresses. Period. > Uh, neither of those reasons undermines the solution others have > proposed: use PI space. That's like saying people can use real money instead of monopoly money. I really don't get this. Did you guys bet a lot of money that there would never be ULA-C or something? If you don't like it, don't use it yourself and filter it, but PLEASE don't whine about it.
- Previous message (by thread): [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Next message (by thread): [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]