This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Previous message (by thread): [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Next message (by thread): [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Roger Jørgensen
roger at jorgensen.no
Tue May 29 10:29:25 CEST 2007
On tir, mai 29, 2007 05:44, Randy Bush wrote: <snip> > if ipv6 space is effectively infinite (and we once thought ipv4 space > was), then what is the use of ula address space? why not just assign > vanilla ipv6 space? It´s not that infinite as people like to belive. We have something between 2^20 and 2^28 as the max number of global networks within the current structure of IPv6. It´s high but far from infinite. -- ------------------------------ Roger Jorgensen | - ROJO9-RIPE - RJ85P-NORID roger at jorgensen.no | - IPv6 is The Key! -------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message (by thread): [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Next message (by thread): [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]