[ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Previous message (by thread): [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Next message (by thread): [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
s.steffann at computel.nl
Tue May 29 10:21:43 CEST 2007
Hi Randy, > ok, i give. if ula address space is assigned/managed by > registries, how is it actually different from pi space? Basically ULA space has the same 'routability' as RFC1918 space, with the added benefit of less (or in case of ULA central: no) possibility for conflicting addresses when merging/connecting separate networks. PI space is expected to be routed globally (if the user of the space wants to). > if ipv6 space is effectively infinite (and we once thought ipv4 space > was), then what is the use of ula address space? why not just assign > vanilla ipv6 space? At this moment there is no IPv6 PI spa
- Previous message (by thread): [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Next message (by thread): [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]