Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Previous message (by thread): Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Next message (by thread): Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ricardo Patara
patara at lacnic.net
Thu May 24 22:13:57 CEST 2007
hi > Are there similar statistics in the other RIR area? If the picture is > similar we have in RIPE region, then we have think over PI address > policy.... > > Only my 2 cents.... > > Janos Mohacsi > Network Engineer, Research Associate, Head of Network Planning and Projects > NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY > Key 70EF9882: DEC2 C685 1ED4 C95A 145F 4300 6F64 7B00 70EF 9882 this would be the comparison between number of allocations with number of assignments in our region: Allocation 1999 11 2000 42 2001 74 2002 70 2003 104 2004 153 2005 157 2006 202 Assignment 1999 0 2000 7 2001 3 2002 2 2003 6 2004 9 2005 6 2006 14 ricardo patara LACNIC Registration Service Manager --
- Previous message (by thread): Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Next message (by thread): Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]