[address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marcus Stoegbauer
ms at man-da.de
Thu May 24 10:15:54 CEST 2007
Sascha Lenz wrote: > Filiz Yilmaz wrote: >> PDP Number: 2006-01 >> Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations >> >> Dear Colleagues >> >> The text of the policy proposal 2006-01 has changed. >> >> We have published the new version today, as a result the discussion >> period for this proposal has been extended until 19 June 2007. > [...] > > For the records: i don't really support the current 2006-01 draft in > this incarnation. It doesn't really fit anymore. Main reason: Limitation > to "multihoming". I agree with Sascha here, only considering multihoming as a reason for IPv6 PI space is a big step backwards from the former versions of the proposal. For me it is too big of a limitation to support the draft in this incarnation. Marcus -- man-da.de GmbH, AS8365 Phone: +49 6151 16-6956 Petersenstr. 30 Fax: +49 6151 16-3050 D-64287 Darmstadt e-mail: ms at man-da.de Geschäftsführer Dr. Jürgen Ohrnberger AG Darmstadt, HRB 94 84
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]