Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Previous message (by thread): Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Next message (by thread): Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mohacsi Janos
mohacsi at niif.hu
Wed May 23 11:59:11 CEST 2007
On Wed, 23 May 2007, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote: > Sascha, > > Sascha Lenz wrote: > > [...] > >> P.S.: Anyone got any recent numbers about the percentage of PI >> announcements in the table vs. PA announcements + deaggregates? >> > that's probably not the fully adequate answer, but I considered the > info in the following two slides (page 9 and 10) as very interesting > in this context: > > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-54/presentations/RIPE_NCC_Statistics.pdf > > The bottom line is that the # of PI assignments has (considerably) > surpassed the number of PA assignments since 2003, and that the load on the > routing table for PI is thus bigger than for PA, although the *percentage* of > PI space as compared to PA is approx. 2%. > > Or, the other way 'round, we use more than 50% of (additional) routing table > slots for some 2% of address space (PI) and less than 50% for some 98% of PA. Are there similar statistics in the other RIR area? If the picture is similar we have in RIPE region, then we have think over PI address policy.... Only my 2 cents.... Janos Mohacsi Network Engineer, Research Associate, Head of Network Planning and Projects NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY Key 70EF9882: DEC2 C685 1ED4 C95A 145F 4300 6F64 7B00 70EF 9882
- Previous message (by thread): Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Next message (by thread): Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]