[ppml] [address-policy-wg] Re: article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)
- Previous message (by thread): [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Re: article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)
- Next message (by thread): [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Re: article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
bmanning at karoshi.com
bmanning at karoshi.com
Tue May 22 17:24:06 CEST 2007
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 10:45:12AM +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > > Don't forget that address space is only useful if it's (almost) > universally accepted. that is hardly true. > Just make sure the price is high enough that people aren't going to > use up excessively large amounts and any domain registry/registrar > should be able to give those out. selling numbers eh? thats a neat trick. will RIPE sell me address space? --bill
- Previous message (by thread): [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Re: article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)
- Next message (by thread): [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Re: article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]