[address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
Tue May 15 09:24:42 CEST 2007
Tony Hain wrote: > Owen DeLong wrote: > >>...... [...] > > The noise about PI blowing out the routing system is just that, -noise-. If > all ~20k AS entities came and demanded PI space we would have a whopping 20k > routing entries in the IPv6 DFZ BGP mesh. At 1/10th the IPv4 table, and > basically stable vs. growing at a compound rate, that is not even > noticeable. I have long since stopped listening to *that* "-noise-" as you put it. > Tony I am prepared to start listening again as soon as the "Gain"-figures in the CIDR report start to change dramatically: --- 11May07 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsAggr NetGain % Gain Description Table 217147 140280 76867 35.4% All ASes Wilfried.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] article about IPv6 vs firewalls vs NAT in arstechnica (seen on slashdot)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]