[address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ jordi.palet at consulintel.es
Mon May 14 10:53:50 CEST 2007
That may be true for IPv6 operational issues, however, following the IETF procedures, for discussing about ULA-central, which is an IPv6 WG item, it should be done at the ipv6 at ietf.org mail exploder. Regards, Jordi > De: <michael.dillon at bt.com> > Responder a: <ppml-bounces at arin.net> > Fecha: Mon, 14 May 2007 09:46:56 +0100 > Para: <ppml at arin.net>, <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> > Conversación: [ppml] Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing? > Asunto: Re: [ppml] Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing? > > >> If anyone want to discuss about the ULA-central ID, I encourage to > bring >> that discussion to the ipv6 WG mailing list, no need to create a new > one. >> For discussions about the policy proposal, use the corresponding RIR > mail >> exploder. > > I don't know if Fred Baker's message on the IETF list made it to the RIR > lists, but he offers a single central discussion place for the central > ULA concept. > > -----quoted from IETF list--------- > In your email, you noted the disjoint nature of the RIRs and the need to > cross-post or whatever. Speaking as chair of IPv6 Operations > (v6ops at ops.ietf.org), I would invite you and all those interested in the > effort to use the v6ops list for the purpose and the v6ops working group > as a venue to do the work. If you would like, we can arrange a v6ops > interim meeting at the RIR meeting of your choice, or it could be > discussed in the currently-planned meeting in the third week of July in > Chicago. > --------------- > > So, now there is no longer any need to complain that the IETF is too > slow or that the RIRs need to work in parallel. Anyone can join the > v6ops list (instructions here > http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/v6ops-charter.html ) and anyone can > propose how central ULAs could be made to work. And for those who wish > to meet face-to-face, there is an opportunity in Chicago in July. > > Hopefully, the v6ops list will look at other alternatives such as using > AS numbers to define a block of addresses similar to the way GLOP > defined multicast addressing in RFC 3180 > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3180.txt > > --Michael Dillon > > _______________________________________________ > This message sent to you through the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List > (PPML at arin.net). > Manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml ********************************************** The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 ! http://www.ipv6day.org This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.