Fwd: [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
> * michael.dillon at bt.com <michael.dillon at bt.com> [2007-05-10 11:09]:
[...]
>>
>> No other application is justified?
> 
> No, I don't say that. I'm not happy with these "numerical"
> requirements. But I'm *more* happy with the SOA count (in our case)
> then the 512 byte limit.

Everyone can create as many SOA-records as necessary. I don't think that this is a good idea to
count the number of hosted domains. I've even seen customers which generate a subdomain for each
A-record.
The 512 byte limit is hard to prove but it's for protocol reasons. Nevertheless, does it still make
sense?

> 
> 
> Sebastian
> 
Johann

- --
Johann Gutauer, jgutauer at cw.net                  Sen. Netw. Engineer DNS
Cable&Wireless Telecommunication Services GmbH
Landsberger Str.155 D-80687 München Deutschland
Geschäftsführer Francois Goreux, Richard Pennal
Amtsgericht München HRB 146 617
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGQxeMQ7r8ZjAASRARArPqAJ9f/FUAwNFA1fg+lm5U5c7P3tkXuQCfdgSN
V4SXua4nc8c2WPrgVtVvYPc=
=D+uF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----