Fwd: [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)
- Next message (by thread): Fwd: [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jeroen Massar
jeroen at unfix.org
Wed May 9 15:35:33 CEST 2007
[ can people avoid using HTML please.... eyes hurt etc ] Heather Skanks wrote: [..] > That said, the change from > "If the name server set of a ccTLD or a gTLD " > to: > "If the name server set of an organisation running DNS" > The rest of the policy goes on to make the requirement that they have 8 > or more IP addresses for the services (pre anycasting) > and demonstration of the need to do anycasting. > > The new text seems to change the policy to hinge more on the need to > anycast as justification for this space, rather than the service being > critical infrastructure. As without that little rule I could simply ask for a nice chunk of /24 PI space for my "DNS servers" which are used for my single domain. (Gert I need a /24 PI for my unfix.org dns servers!!!! kidding :) That said, as this policy is specific for organizations running, why not simply have a "minimum amount of DNS 2nd and 1st level zones served". Giving the criteria "runs one or more TLD's" justification to apply to this policy. And "runs more than a 10.000 1st level domains" justification to apply to it too. (10k chosen arbitrarily, I'll let the folks here figure that number out :) Greets, Jeroen (in the above TLD = ".com", 1st level domain == "example.com", 2nd level domain would be "marketing.example.com", of course for TLD's like .uk, a 1st level domain is "example.co.uk") -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 311 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20070509/35972693/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)
- Next message (by thread): Fwd: [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]