[address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Shane Kerr
shane at time-travellers.org
Wed May 2 17:03:23 CEST 2007
All, I think the draft this proposal refers to: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipv6-ula-central-01 Is an early version of what eventually became RFC 4193: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4193 The RFC does not have any centrally assigned addresses. I didn't actually follow the discussion in the IETF about this document, so I don't know why the centrally assigned version was removed. It's not actually clear to me what the policy proposal is. Does it intend for the RIPE NCC to act as a central registry for all local IPv6 addresses? Does it intend for a special membership category be set up for this? -- Shane
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 ULA-Central)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]