[address-policy-wg] 2006-02 Last Call for Comments (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-02 Last Call for Comments (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-02 Last Call for Comments (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed Jun 27 16:45:41 CEST 2007
Hi, On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 10:32:52AM -0400, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: > Are you assuming that organizations never subnet inside a building ? > > In IPv6 if you want to keep things working, the minimum network is /64, so > if somebody want to subnet, you need to give them something bigger, and > current IETF recommendations are still /48, as per RFC3177. There's nothing in the IETF recommendations that says "per building". So giving a customer a /48, and having that customer assign /56s out of that space to individual buildings, and taking /64s from there to individual LAN networks, is a perfectly workable approach. Gert Doering -- APWG chairs -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 113403 SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-02 Last Call for Comments (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-02 Last Call for Comments (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]