[ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Previous message (by thread): [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Next message (by thread): [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Roque Gagliano
rgaglian at antel.net.uy
Thu Jun 7 15:43:57 CEST 2007
> > ULAs are not intended to be publically routed by ISPs. While some may > attempt to get ISPs to route them, ISPs will have clear documentation > saying they are not intended to be used that way, and they are free to > filter them. And in fact they SHOULD be filtered. (I'd say MUST, but > since that is not enforceable...) Should ULA-C be published in the Whois database? what about reverse DNS for them, should they be delegated or just reply a NXDOMAIN? Roque ------------------------------------------------------------- Roque Gagliano ANTEL - URUGUAY rgaglian at antel.net.uy -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20070607/e30ad051/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Next message (by thread): [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]