[address-policy-wg] new policy proposal (reserve IPv4 space for new architecture)

What about using the Class E for this use?
Roque

On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 17:43 +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> (I have changed the subject, as this is a different proposal from 2007-06!)
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 11:30:37PM +1000, Robin Whittle wrote:
> > I believe that a substantial amount of the remaining IPv4 space
> > should be put aside to be used with whichever new architecture is
> > developed to deal with the routing and addressing problems
> > discussed last year in the IAB RAWS workshop.
> 
> This is going to be a tough one, for various reasons.
> 
>  - as this is a global change in the way all RIRs are supposed to operate,
>    it needs to be made a global policy
> 
>  - which, in turn, means that all RIR constituencies need to agree to 
>    this proposal
> 
>  - which, in turn, means for the RIPE region that you need to submit 
>    a formal proposal to the PDP process 
>     (http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/index.html)
>    and get consensus that this is the right way to proceed.
> 
> 
> Adding to this that the "new BGP" is likely not going to happen before 
> the current IPv4 pool has run out, I'm pessimistic whether this proposal
> will find much support in the communities, or will be seen as "taking 
> away the last remains of IPv4 from those who need/want it".
> 
> Fortunately, I'm not to judge this, but just to steer the process...
> 
> Gert Doering
>         -- APWG chair
-- 

------------------------------------------------------------- 
Roque Gagliano ANTEL - URUGUAY 
rgaglian at antel.net.uy 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20070730/d2913f75/attachment.sig>