[address-policy-wg] Re: 2006-02 Discussion Period extended until 19 March 2007 (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Poli
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: 2006-02 Discussion Period extended until 19 March 2007 (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Poli
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: 2006-02 Discussion Period extended until 19 March 2007 (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Tue Feb 27 22:34:27 CET 2007
Hi, just as a side note: On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 09:41:55AM +0100, Michael Adams wrote: > [...] If it comes to a vote I would say yes. We're *not* voting in "RIPE policy land" - if only due to practical problems "who gets to vote, who has how many votes, etc." But of course you're helping me/us by clearly stating "I am in favour of the proposal [because...]" or "I am opposing this proposal [because...]" :) So - thanks to those that have participated this round. Good input. regards, Gert Doering -- RIPE APWG chair -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 98999 SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: 2006-02 Discussion Period extended until 19 March 2007 (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Poli
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: 2006-02 Discussion Period extended until 19 March 2007 (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]