[address-policy-wg] Re: 2006-02 Discussion Period extended until 19 March 2007 (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: 2006-02 Discussion Period extended until 19 March 2007 (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: 2006-02 Discussion Period extended until 19 March 2007 (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
Mon Feb 26 13:39:08 CET 2007
Sascha, Sascha Lenz wrote: > Hi, > > Gert Doering schrieb: > >> Hi everybody, [...] > > I supported the key point of the proposal (getting rid of some no longer > needed obstacles for LIRs who want to get an IPv6 Allocation) from the > start, so the changes are fine with me. > > I don't think there are any relevant downsides like (relevant) routing > table growth -> i don't see _any_ downsides from the main changes. > > What i won't do now is commenting on minor wording issues; i want this > proposal to be passed, NOW, not to continue some more years with some > more versions of the draft. I think this can be dealt with in a > follow-up proposal if really needed in this case. The main points are fine. thanks for pointing out *that* aspect, I am with you. My proposal was more along the lines of - if we have to touch it again, anyway,... > (BTW: This is not a personal issue, i have all my IPv6 Allocations > already :-) I just want to get this done for the sake of IPv6 > distribution since we're discussing about that for ages now!) Same here :-) Wilfried.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: 2006-02 Discussion Period extended until 19 March 2007 (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: 2006-02 Discussion Period extended until 19 March 2007 (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]