[address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignment Size)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignment Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Max Tulyev
president at ukraine.su
Wed Feb 14 17:42:25 CET 2007
+1 :) I fully support that proposal. I think it is also a good idea to add a field 'Global: Yes/No' in the requet. If for example the net is requested for private peering - it can be smaller than /24 safe as not attended to be globally reachable. If the net is requested for announcing in global routing table - it should be /24 even if customer really need 1 IP at all. Filiz Yilmaz wrote: > PDP Number: 2006-05 > PI Assignment Size > > Dear Colleagues > > We have published a draft document for the proposal described in > 2006-05. > > This proposal suggests to have the minimum assignment size for PI > assignments to be a /24 when routing is a major issue for a > multihoming End User. > > You can find the full proposal at: > > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2006-05.html > > and the draft document at: > > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/draft-documents/2006-05-draft.html > > We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments > to address-policy-wg at ripe.net before 14 March 2007. > > Regards > > Filiz Yilmaz > RIPE NCC > Policy Development Officer > -- WBR, Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253 at FIDO)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignment Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]