[address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignment Size)

+1 :)

I fully support that proposal.

I think it is also a good idea to add a field 'Global: Yes/No' in the
requet. If for example the net is requested for private peering - it can
be smaller than /24 safe as not attended to be globally reachable. If
the net is requested for announcing in global routing table - it should
be /24 even if customer really need 1 IP at all.

Filiz Yilmaz wrote:
> PDP Number: 2006-05
> PI Assignment Size
> 
> Dear Colleagues
> 
> We have published a draft document for the proposal described in
> 2006-05.
> 
> This proposal suggests to have the minimum assignment size for PI
> assignments to be a /24 when routing is a major issue for a
> multihoming End User.
> 
> You can find the full proposal at:
> 
>     http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2006-05.html
> 
> and the draft document at:
> 
>     http://www.ripe.net/ripe/draft-documents/2006-05-draft.html
> 
> We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments
> to address-policy-wg at ripe.net before 14 March 2007.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Filiz Yilmaz
> RIPE NCC 
> Policy Development Officer
> 


-- 
WBR,
Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253 at FIDO)