[address-policy-wg] PI for Not-DNS Anycast.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI for Not-DNS Anycast.
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI for Not-DNS Anycast.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Greg L.
bgp2 at linuxadmin.org
Wed Aug 8 23:50:58 CEST 2007
> > > Who needs a new /24 PI if you are only going to implement DNS anycast in > > your own network? > > I was speaking about global DNS anycast /24 PI allocation with min. ~5 > > disperse locations / networks, verified later by running traceroutes to > > see ASN, data path etc... >[...] >... and it shouldn't be linked to running ccTLD-Servers. Neither in IPv4 >nor in IPv6. Sure it shouldn't. ccTLD DNS hosting requirement for /24 PI anycast assignment already forces small companies into unfair competence with LIR members and big guys. Sincerely, Greg LinuxAdmin.org
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI for Not-DNS Anycast.
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI for Not-DNS Anycast.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]