[address-policy-wg] 2006-02 Discussion Period extended until 16 April 2007 (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-02 Discussion Period extended until 16 April 2007 (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-02 Discussion Period extended until 16 April 2007 (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
Mon Apr 2 13:42:57 CEST 2007
Shane Kerr wrote: > I like the proposed change, as is. So do I, I'd like to state my support for this proposal. This version is pretty clean, consistent and concise, imho. > It seems a good idea to make IPv6 space easier to get. > > Not really related to this specific proposed change, but maybe it is > time to start thinking about making IPv4 space harder to get, too. > > On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 12:26:28PM +0200, Filiz Yilmaz wrote: > >>PDP Number: 2006-02 >>IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy > > >> http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2006-02.html > > > Wilfried.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-02 Discussion Period extended until 16 April 2007 (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-02 Discussion Period extended until 16 April 2007 (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]