[address-policy-wg] Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations (2006-01)
- Previous message (by thread): Keeping in reserve, was: Re: [address-policy-wg] Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations (2006-01)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations (2006-01)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friacas
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Thu Sep 28 14:36:33 CEST 2006
Hello, While I do support the general idea of PI-Assignments for IPv6 (mainly as a way of facilitating certain networks to move into IPv6...), at the moment i do *NOT* support this 2006-01 proposal due to some specific wording, already mentioned by other participants. I'm also in favour of going with /48s, and grow from there if needed. Best Regards, ./Carlos -------------- Wide Area Network (WAN) Workgroup, CMF8-RIPE, CF596-ARIN FCCN - Fundacao para a Computacao Cientifica Nacional http://www.fccn.pt "Internet is just routes (196663/675), naming (millions) and... people!"
- Previous message (by thread): Keeping in reserve, was: Re: [address-policy-wg] Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations (2006-01)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations (2006-01)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]