This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2006-04 Draft Document will be produced (Contact e-mail Address Requirements)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-04 Draft Document will be produced (Contact e-mail Address Requirements)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-04 Draft Document will be produced (Contact e-mail Address Requirements)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
Wed Sep 27 00:02:22 CEST 2006
Denis Walker wrote: [...] > ... If you feel this > should have a higher priority then you may raise the issue on the Database > Working Group or Antispam Working Group or Address Policy Working Group > mailing lists." My feeling is that the only appropriate one is the AP-WG - if at all. Anti-Spam seems to be a niche market, looking at the number of different abusive behaviour patterns, and DB-WG usually looks at issues regarding the tools and the registration machinery. In particular, DB-WG is very reluctant to get drawn into (human) resource allocation (i.e. money :-) ) discussions... Wilfried. PS: I know I am not making new friends with the following text, but still: Spam is not a network or addressing problem - it is an application and socio-economic problem. Now shoot - you know where to find me :-)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-04 Draft Document will be produced (Contact e-mail Address Requirements)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-04 Draft Document will be produced (Contact e-mail Address Requirements)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]