[address-policy-wg] 2006-04 Draft Document will be produced (Contact e-mail Address Requirements)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-04 Draft Document will be produced (Contact e-mail Address Requirements)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-04 Draft Document will be produced (Contact e-mail Address Requirements)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
Wed Sep 27 00:02:22 CEST 2006
Denis Walker wrote: [...] > ... If you feel this > should have a higher priority then you may raise the issue on the Database > Working Group or Antispam Working Group or Address Policy Working Group > mailing lists." My feeling is that the only appropriate one is the AP-WG - if at all. Anti-Spam seems to be a niche market, looking at the number of different abusive behaviour patterns, and DB-WG usually looks at issues regarding the tools and the registration machinery. In particular, DB-WG is very reluctant to get drawn into (human) resource allocation (i.e. money :-) ) discussions... Wilfried. PS: I know I am not making new friends with the following text, but still: Spam is not a network or addressing problem - it is an application and socio-economic problem. Now shoot - you know where to find me :-)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-04 Draft Document will be produced (Contact e-mail Address Requirements)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-04 Draft Document will be produced (Contact e-mail Address Requirements)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]