[address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dmitry Kiselev
dmitry at volia.net
Tue Sep 19 14:09:43 CEST 2006
Hello! On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 03:34:58PM +0000, Max Tulyev wrote: > > If we make PI cost a "reasonable" price (like "extra-small LIR") per > > year, this will not hinder networks that "must have" PI very much - and > > those that find PI a nice and cheap convenience might reconsider. > > In this case, at first you are going to kill a small and extra-small > business (I believe, it is *only* real target for those who speaks > againist PI - to simplify competition for themselves) as well as > non-commertial and educational requesters. > > Second, "PI vs LIR" deal. If one real wants own IP/AS, and ready to pay > for it, this one WILL add a prefix to the global routing table, either > he become a LIR or only get PI. BUT. If costs are equal, EVERY manager > (who make final decision for what to pay) will take MORE "something" (IP > addresses in this case) for same (or near) price. And no technician can > argue with that. So instead of PI /24 they really need, they get a LIR > with at least /21 they really don't need in any case. And we loose in > conservation of address space in 8 times (not winning in aggregation any > percent)!!! Max, how say that fees will be equal? As for me, PI/24+ASN should have yearly fee acceptable for most small companies. If they really need it, they will pay for it. Once payments stoped - resources returned and ready to reassignment. -- Dmitry Kiselev
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]