[address-policy-wg] PI vs PA in routing table
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI vs PA in routing table
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI vs PA in routing table
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Tue Sep 19 14:07:19 CEST 2006
Hi, On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 03:41:06PM +0000, Max Tulyev wrote: > Maybe there is no real "route table PI pollution" trouble in the real world? Currently, there are much more PA entries than PI - but the problem that I see is that the PI growth rate is much higher than PA, and as such, "unlimited PI" might rise to be a problem. Nobody is proposing to disallow PI. Just balance "cost" vs. "convenience" a little bit better. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 94488 SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI vs PA in routing table
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI vs PA in routing table
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]